RABU 0940. GAMBAR TERBARU SAIFUL
-------------------------------------------------------
Kini dia berusia 26 tahun, bukan 23. Silap saya.
Mamat ni dah bersumpah dalam masjid.
Najib pun berani bersumpah tentang isu Altantuya.
Yang belum ialah, ahem, calon perdana menteri 2013.
Walaupun bersumpah tak bermakna tak bersalah, tetapi kalau pembangkang tak mahu percaya dengan keputusan mahkamah, bersumpah dalam masjid pun, pada saya yang tak pandai agama, boleh dapat point dalam pandangan manusia.
Sekurang-kurangnya ia menunjukkan dia berani mengambil nama Allah, memegang Quran dalam isu besar ini. Dan bukan berdolak-dalik.
Tapi ini pandangan orang daif agama.
Mengenai gambar Saiful: Saya pernah bertemu dua kali dengan dia semasa dia menjadi pembantu di pejabat Anwar dan PKR.
Tiga minggu selepas kami kebetulan bertemu (semasa menunggu press conference di pejabat PKR di Tropicana, dan kemudian semasa Anwar memberi ceramah di Keramat), isu sodomi ini meletup.
Dulu Saiful tak ada bintik dua biji di dahinya.
Kata orang, itu tanda orang banyak sembahyang.
Betul ke?
Kan mamat ini penipu besar, kata pembangkang?
Saya cuma tunjuk apa ada dalam gambar, jangan kamu tembak saya pula.
DITANGGUHKAN (lagi)
-------------------------------------------------------
Katanya esok akan bermula. Dulu pun katanya begitu.
Lepas tu tangguh dan tangguh.
Tak tahulah bila perbicaraan akan bermula.
Saya bukan apa. Nak sangat saya lihat apa bukti yang Saiful ni ada.
Sebab kalau setakat 'aku tuduh kamu liwat aku' di sebuah bilik hotel di PJ, tanpa bukti, akan cepat hancur kes ini, Anwar dapat bebas dan kerajaan Umno-BN akan tumbang dalam pandangan ramai.
Kan bagus untuk pembangkang?
Jika bukti yang dibawa Saiful lemah dalam pandangan ramai - the court of public opinion - tetapi mahkamah tetap kata Anwar salah dan sumbat dia dalam jail, tentu akan menjadi kemarahan rakyat juga.
Jadi, dengan melewat-lewatkan permulaan ini, ia seperti menunjukkan seperti Anwar takut nak berdepan dengan bukti.
Tentunya pandangan seperti ini seleweng.
Sebab takkan seorang berusia 62 tahun dapat bertenggek dengan budak muda, berusia 23 tahun DULU, kini 26 (pembetulan), yang lebih tinggi darinya tanpa Saiful dapat menolak balik sehingga Anwar jatuh patah pinggang.
Tentunya Saiful tak ada bukti?
Dan Anwar kata nak bawa isteri tercinta Wan Azizah Ismail sebagai alibi.
OK what! Maknanya akan hancur kes ini.
Jadi, tolonglah percepatkan mulanya drama mahkamah ni!
Agar Anwar dapat lepas dan boleh terus kempen untuk jadi PM dalam 2013.
Semakin lama diheret begini semakin membusukkan nama negara.
Malaysia is always attracting the wrong headlines. Saya kata gini, orang Malaysia marah pula.
Jadi Saudara Anwar, kasi cepat start lah brader.
Tak gereklah gini, kata mamat Geylang.
------------------------------------------------------
EARLIER POSTING
He controls international public opinion with a clever meeting with diplomats.
He controls international media opinion that the charges were all trumped up. You can see reports with such tones written by the major news agencies, the minor news websites and even the international magazines.
And Anwar Ibrahim is slick at doing these even as the Najib administration is seemingly hiding in the bunkers, seemingly unable to resolve the Allah issue, answer questions about the economy, uniting people again, etc.
The Chinese and Indians are angry with the government over the handling of the Allah issue.
The Malays are also angry with the government.
And now PM Najib Razak is facing a hurricane known as Sodomy 2.
And yet, the trial has not even started!
As a reporter, I covered the 1998 to 2000 trials involving the former deputy prime minister and finance minister.
I was in court almost daily (depan Dataran Merdeka), including seeing the infamous tilam Dunlop brought into court, watching Sukma Dermawan, driver Azizan, Ummi Hafilda and Anwar himself testifying.
Anwar was charged with abuse of power (basically for telling police personnel to force Ummi Hafilda and friend to retract allegations of sexual improprieties) and for sodomy.
I saw a lot of bullshit by both sides in court and outside. By both sides, yes.
Now the country will go through that spectacle again.
These days, the opposition had already decided that the court system is corrupt and can be manipulated by the government.
Ie anything less that a 'Not Guilty' verdict will mean that the judiciary is corrupt. The government has influenced the judges.
So the next time, if ever, you guys get brought up to court for not paying taxes, or for rape and murder, you should insist the same: We accept only a 'Not Guilty' verdict.
Anything else means the court system is corrupt and the judges have been bought.
Sigh.
I am not so much against Anwar or the opposition (I have said many times that as a reporter, I cannot take sides), as the fact that the court system to them is just another thing to manipulate to their advantage - the country's reputation be damned.
Re-read here my argument over the Perak issue - where the opposition only supports any court decision when it says Nizar betul, Zambry salah.
Anything else means that the court is corrupt.
Kalau macam ni, dia menang selalulah.
Oops, before I forget: The court will very soon decide on the Nizar-Zambry case.
So if Zambry wins 5-0, will the opposition accept the court decision?
I might as well ask if it's going to snow in Malaysia tomorrow.
It won't happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment